Corporate M&A, Integration & Transformation
A deal doubles the record overnight: two vendor masters, two charts of accounts, two versions of every process. Cerenovus reads both companies whole, reconciles the masters, prices the duplicated spend and the colliding workflows, and watches the consents, notice periods, and TSA deadlines the transaction just set in motion. And the reasoning is kept: ask why a decision was made two years later and the record answers with the original documents.
Designed for
Corporate development leaders, integration offices, and transformation executives at serial acquirers.
Both companies read whole and reconciled before day one: duplicated spend priced, triggered obligations watched, decision history kept through transformation.
Industry loop
How the work runs
Each stage below ends with something you can inspect: the finding, its source, and its owner.
Industry-specific operating detail
Read the target alongside your own
Connect the data room in diligence, then both companies’ systems at close: contracts, ledgers, tickets, email, meeting notes. Cerenovus reads the target alongside your own operation, with pre-close boundaries enforced.
Overlap stops being a workshop topic. Where the two operations duplicate vendors, processes, or spend, the record shows it with dollar figures before the integration plan is drafted.
Reconcile both masters
Cerenovus reconciles both vendor masters, both customer files, both charts of accounts. Every fact traces to a verbatim quote with page-level anchors, and a quote that cannot be found in its source never enters the record.
Where the two records conflict, evidence decides. Integration decisions start from reconciled facts, not competing spreadsheets.
Carry the thesis into integration
Nothing that justified the deal gets left behind in the deal team’s inbox. The synergy case, the assumptions, and the commitments each side made before signing carry into integration with their sources attached.
Why the thesis said what it said remains on file when integration reality tests it. Changed facts separate cleanly from changed explanations.
Sequence day one and after
Day-one readiness is a list of dependencies, and the record holds them: which contracts need consent to transfer, which systems carry which processes, which obligations move at close and which stay behind under a TSA.
The sequence is built against the record and watched against it. When a prerequisite slips, everything that depends on it is visible that day, not at the next steering committee.
Watch the TSAs and handoffs
TSAs expire on dates, not on readiness. Cerenovus watches each one against the work it covers: the migration that was supposed to finish, the handoff that was supposed to happen, the exit criteria nobody has evidenced yet.
The absence engine catches the integration step that stopped moving while attention was elsewhere. Breaks surface early, while they cost a schedule change instead of a TSA extension fee.
Hold synergies to the ledger
Every claimed synergy is held to the ledger, and the figure opens to the calculation behind it. Claimed value and landed value stay distinguishable, with receipts.
The commitment ledger holds every promise from both sides. A saving with no fulfilling event by its deadline surfaces as broken, while there is still time in the integration to recover it.
Answer the board, cited
When the board asks whether the deal is delivering, the answer comes with receipts: synergies landed against synergies claimed, TSAs exited against plan, every line opening downward until the original document.
The coverage report states what has been read and what remains unknown across both companies. Integration risk hides in the unread share, and here that share is declared.
Keep the reasoning through transformation
Integration becomes transformation, and the record carries through it. Which assumptions held, which dependencies bit, which decisions produced durable value: all of it stays on file with its evidence.
The next transaction starts from what this one proved. Deal teams change, and the decision history does not.
Where Cerenovus creates the most value
Overlap found with dollar figures attached
Cerenovus reconciles both vendor masters and both customer files, then sweeps the combined operation: duplicate payments the combined entity makes twice, overlapping vendors at different prices, colliding processes, contract obligations that move at close. Where the records conflict, a signed contract beats a newer hearsay note, and genuine ties surface as disputes.
The integration step that stalled, caught that week
Every claimed saving is measured against the ledger, and the number can be checked line by line, so claimed value and landed value stay distinguishable. The watch catches the migration that stopped moving, the handoff that never happened, the TSA burning toward its date with no exit evidence. Breaks in the integration reach the steering committee early, not as surprises.
The thesis survives into integration
The record that justified the deal carries into the integration that delivers it. Assumptions, commitments, and decision rationale stay on file with their sources as teams and advisers change. When integration reality tests the thesis, the original reasoning is there to test against, with receipts.
Relevant Cerenovus mechanisms
Why the findings hold up
Each capability links to how it works.
- 01Entity resolutionIdentity and relationship resolution
- 02Time-aware recordSource, coverage, and version history
- 03Commitment trackingAccess rules and responsible ownership
- 04Continuous sweepsConflicts, uncertainty, and current status
- 05Checked calculationsProcess and dependency reconstruction
- 06Drill-down citationsDecisions, issues, and downstream effects
Where to go next